Pease

Pease v. County of Nevada

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20252:24-cv-02189California3,970 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD ISAAC PEASE, II, Case No. 2:24-cv-02189-CSK Plaintiff, v. PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND

ORDER DISMISSING DOE DEFENDANTS

COUNTY OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants. 16 READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DATES THAT THE COURT WILL STRICTLY ENFORCE AND WITH WHICH ALL COUNSEL AND PARTIES, INCLUDING THOSE PROCEEDING WITHOUT COUNSEL, MUST COMPLY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF MONETARY AND ALL OTHER APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS. On January 7, 2025, the Court conducted a status (pretrial scheduling) conference in this matter. At the status conference, attorney R. Ellis Harper appeared on behalf of Plaintiff, and attorney John Swafford appeared on behalf of Defendants. After considering the parties’ joint status report (ECF No. 17), and the status conference held, the Court issues the following pretrial scheduling order.1 27 This matter proceeds before the undersigned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.