People v. Wallace CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 2025H050429California8,868 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lie, J.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Operative Information In January 2022, the Santa Clara County District Attorney charged Wallace by information with assault with a deadly weapon on Edgar Rodriguez (§ 245, subd. (a)(1); count 1), assault with a deadly weapon on Julia Gutierrez (§ 245, subd. (a)(1); count 2), first degree burglary with the allegation that persons not an accomplice (Julia Gutierrez and Edgar Rodriguez) were present (§§ 460, subd. (a), 667.5, subd. (c)(21); count 3), and misdemeanor exhibition of a deadly weapon other than a firearm in the presence of Christopher Latigue (§ 417, subd. (a)(1); count 4).2 As to counts 1 and 2, it was alleged

1 Unspecified statutory references are to the Penal Code. 2 As to counts 1 through 3, the prosecutor alleged following aggravating circumstances under section 1170, subdivision (b): the crimes involved great violence, threat of bodily harm, or other acts disclosing a high degree of cruelty, viciousness, or callousness (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 4.421(a)(1)), Wallace was armed with or used a weapon at the time of the commission of the crime (id., rule 4.421(a)(2)), Wallace had engaged in violent conduct that indicates a serious danger to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.