Taiming Zhang v. Twitter, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JAN 10 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TAIMING ZHANG, No. 23-16125
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-00980-JSC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TWITTER, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jacqueline Scott Corley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 10, 2025**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Taiming Zhang appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal of his
action against X Corp.1 arising from X Corp.’s suspension of his account and its
failure to suspend the account of another user. Reviewing de novo, we affirm.
The district court correctly found that Zhang failed to plead the required
elements of each of his claims, specifically: (1) breach of…