Ricardo Polanco Gonzalez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 202520-70963California570 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICARDO ANTONIO POLANCO No. 20-70963 GONZALEZ, Agency No. A205-318-454 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND,

Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 4, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: COLLINS, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Ricardo Antonio Polanco Gonzalez (“Polanco”) seeks review of a

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or “Board”) decision affirming a decision by

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying Petitioner’s motion to reopen removal

proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

The court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.