Ricardo Polanco Gonzalez v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 202520-70963California570 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 10 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RICARDO ANTONIO POLANCO No. 20-70963 GONZALEZ, Agency No. A205-318-454 Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND,
Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 4, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: COLLINS, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Ricardo Antonio Polanco Gonzalez (“Polanco”) seeks review of a
Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or “Board”) decision affirming a decision by
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying Petitioner’s motion to reopen removal
proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.