Fernando Dela Cruz v. Louis Dejoy

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 202523-15808California516 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAN 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FERNANDO NAHIL DELA CRUZ, No. 23-15808

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-01140-DMR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Donna M. Ryu, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 10, 2025**

Before O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges:

Fernando dela Cruz appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment on his

Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)1 claim arising from the termination of his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(1). employment with the United States Postal Service (USPS). He appeals the district

court’s judgment after a bench trial and the district court’s denial of his motion for

reconsideration. We review the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.