Ramsey

Ramsey v. City of Lake Havasu City

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 202523-3244California2,005 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JAN 10 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-3244

TRAVIS RAMSEY; SUSAN RAMSEY,

Guardian on behalf of Ward,

Plaintiffs - Appellees, DC No. 3:20-cv-08189-DLR-ESW v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF LAKE HAVASU CITY, a municipal corporation; LOUIS HUGH PLUNKETT III, Officer, in his official and individual capacities,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

John Zachary Boyle, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 7, 2024 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, TASHIMA, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Defendant City of Lake Havasu Officer Hugh Plunkett, III, appeals from the

district court’s decision denying him qualified immunity at summary judgment.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Travis Ramsey, an autistic person, and his legal guardian, Susan Ramsey, brought

this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the

Rehabilitation Act, and state law against the City…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.