Urmancheev

Urmancheev v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20253:22-cv-01039California7,846 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 A.S. URMANCHEEV, Case No.: 22-CV-1039 JLS (MMP) #A075117610,

ORDER REGARDING AMENDED

Plaintiff, COMPLAINT v. 14 1) DISMISSING ALL DEFENDANTS

EXCEPT THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES, et al.,

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

Defendants. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 17 2) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO

EFFECT SERVICE OF COMPLAINT

AND SUMMONS ON DEFENDANT

UNITED STATES PURSUANT TO §

20 1915(d) & Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) 21 (ECF No. 29) 23 Presently before the Court is pro se Plaintiff A.S. Urmancheev’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC,” ECF No. 29). As Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”), the SAC is subject to mandatory screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s pleading and the law, the Court finds Plaintiff’s SAC alleges plausible Federal Tort Claims Act claims for false imprisonment,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.