Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Smith
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Case Nos. 23-cv-3090-JSC Plaintiff, 23-cv-6135-JSC 8 24-cv-3344-JSC v. 24-cv-9335-JSC
RUSSELL A. ROBINSON, et al., VEXATIOUS LITIGANT ORDER RE: Defendants. RUSSELL ROBINSON
12 On three separate occasions Defendant Russell Robinson has improperly removed the 13 same state court foreclosure proceeding into new actions in this Court. See Case No. 23-3090; 14 Case No. 23-6135; Case No. 24-3344; Case No. 24-9335. The second time he did so in Case No. 15 23-6135, the Court ordered him to show cause as to why a vexatious litigant order barring him 16 from further removals of this state court action absent prior federal court approval should not be 17 entered against him. (Case No. 23-6135, Dkt. No. 30.1) In his response to the Order to Show 18 Cause, Robinson argued he had only removed the action on one prior occasion and reiterated his 19 argument as to why the actions were removable. (Case No. 23-6135, Dkt. No. 33.) …