McGee

McGee v. Alameda County Sheriff Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20253:24-cv-00949California523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTHONY MCGEE, Case No. 24-cv-00949-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER REVOKING PLAINTIFF’S IN

v. FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS

ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF

DEPARTMENT,

11 Defendant.

12 In Anthony McGee’s pending appeal, the Ninth Circuit made a limited referral back to this Court to determine whether a prior grant of in forma pauperis (IFP) status should continue, or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. Dkt. No. 37. An indigent party who cannot afford the expense of pursuing an appeal may file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a), “a party to a district-court action who desires to appeal in forma pauperis must file a motion in the district court.” Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). The party must attach an affidavit that (1) shows in detail “the party’s inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs,” (2) “claims an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.