Robinson
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Robinson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Case No. 24-cv-09335- JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO
v. ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR
COURT
RUSSELL A ROBINSON, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 6 Defendants.
12 This case arises out of years of litigation following Wells Fargo’s foreclosure of a home 13 owned by Defendant Equaan Smith in which Defendant Robinson, her former attorney, owns a 14 four percent interest. In 2020, Wells Fargo brought an action for declaratory relief, cancellation of 15 instrument, quiet title, and slander of title in the Alameda County Superior Court. See Wells 16 Fargo Bank, N.A. VS Smith, No. RG20051563. Two years later, the parties filed a stipulated 17 dismissal following a settlement whereby judgment was entered in Wells Fargo’s favor. Since this 18 time, Defendants have removed the action to this court on four occasions, seeking to prevent the 19 superior court from ruling on pending motions to enforce the judgment and/or convey possession 20 of the subject property to Wells Fargo. See…