Bennett

Bennett v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20253:24-cv-04157California713 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

13 Plaintiff, an inmate at the Yolo County Jail who is proceeding without representation by an 14 attorney, filed this civil action. He is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate 15 order. For the reasons discussed below, the Complaint is DISMISSED without leave to amend for 16 failure to state a claim that is capable of judicial determination, and his motion for “certificate of 17 citizenship and travel papers and passport” (ECF No. 11) is DENIED.

BACKGROUND

19 Plaintiff alleges he is not a United States citizen, and in 2006 the Immigration and Naturalization Services (“I.N.S.”)1 detained him “for deportation” based upon a conviction for 21 robbery. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) After receiving a “second chance,” he “continued being a career 22 criminal and breached that contract agreement” with convictions in state court for carjacking, 23 escape, and weapons charges between 2006 and 2024. (Id.) He asserts his appointed attorney 24 from the Public Defender’s Office of Santa Clara County is “ineffective” and alleges she is 25 “extorting me by embarrassment publishing and distributing my (SCAR) Suspected Child Abuse 26 Report.” (Id. at 2.) He…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.