Rivas

(PC) See v. Rivas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20251:23-cv-01354California1,940 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOU SENG SEE, Case No. 1:23-cv-01354-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL

v. (ECF No. 42) RIVAS, et al., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR SUBPOENA AS MOOT

Defendants. (ECF No. 49) 16 I. Procedural History Plaintiff Mou Seng See (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Rivas, Roman, Rivera, and Dorado (“Defendants”) for deliberate indifference to the need for medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On September 9, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel. (ECF No. 42.) Following a meet and confer, the parties filed a joint statement indicating that they were unable to resolve the discovery dispute and Request for Production No. 2 remained at issue. (ECF No. 45.) The Court reinstated briefing on the motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.