Campbell

(PC) Harper v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20251:24-cv-01549California1,530 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9 DANIEL HARPER, Case No. 1:24-cv-1549 EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 11 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S IFP

TAMMY CAMPBELL, et al., APPLICATION BE DENIED AND THAT

PLAINTIFF BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE

Defendants. FILING FEE IN FULL IF HE WANTS TO

PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION

15 (ECF No. 2)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

17 18 Plaintiff Daniel Harper is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. 19 (ECF No. 1). On January 2, 2025, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis in 20 this action. (ECF No. 2). 21 Because the Court concludes that Plaintiff had at least three “strikes” prior to filing this 22 action and because he was not in imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time he filed 23 it, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff be required to pay the $405 filing fee in full if he wants 24 to proceed with the action. I. THREE-STRIKES PROVISION OF 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) Pertinent here is the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.