Campbell
(PC) Harper v. Campbell
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9 DANIEL HARPER, Case No. 1:24-cv-1549 EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 11 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S IFP
TAMMY CAMPBELL, et al., APPLICATION BE DENIED AND THAT
PLAINTIFF BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE
Defendants. FILING FEE IN FULL IF HE WANTS TO
PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION
15 (ECF No. 2)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS
17 18 Plaintiff Daniel Harper is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. 19 (ECF No. 1). On January 2, 2025, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis in 20 this action. (ECF No. 2). 21 Because the Court concludes that Plaintiff had at least three “strikes” prior to filing this 22 action and because he was not in imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time he filed 23 it, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff be required to pay the $405 filing fee in full if he wants 24 to proceed with the action. I. THREE-STRIKES PROVISION OF 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) Pertinent here is the…