(PS) Vitaly v. Arcade Creek Recreation Park District

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KONONOV VITALY, No. 2:24-cv-1743-KJM-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ARCADE CREEK RECREATION PARK DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 18 Plaintiff Kononov Vitaly is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On June 20, 2024, Plaintiff filed a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1 and 2. Plaintiff seeks to require the defendants to water and otherwise maintain certain area parks in a particular manner. On October 15, 2024, the Court screened the complaint per the screening process required by the IFP statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and found the complaint failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. ECF No. 8. The Complaint did not contain a short and plain statement (1) setting forth the grounds for federal jurisdiction or (2) showing Plaintiff’s entitlement to…