Viriyapunt

Viriyapunt v. Central State Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20252:24-cv-02078California1,103 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NORMA VIRIYAPUNT, No. 2:24-cv-02078-DC-AC Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

v. VIRIYAPUNT’S RENEWED MOTION TO

APPOINT PAUL VIRIYAPUNT AS

CENTRAL STATE CREDIT UNION, GUARDIAN AD LITEM

Defendant. (Doc. No. 26) 16 On November 27, 2024, Plaintiff Norma Viriyapunt filed a motion to appoint Paul Viriyapunt as her guardian ad litem. (Doc. No. 20.) The court denied the motion without prejudice because the motion did not comply with the requirements of Local Rule 202(c). (Doc. No. 25.) On January 6, 2025, Plaintiff filed a renewed motion to appoint Paul Viriyapunt as guardian ad litem. (Doc. No. 26.)1 Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the pending motion is taken under submission to be decided on the papers. Accordingly, the court vacates the hearing on the pending motion scheduled for February 21, 2025. For the reasons explained below, the court will 24 1 Local Rule 202(a) provides “[u]pon commencement of an action or upon initial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.