(PS) Gilbert v. Clear Recon Corp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20252:24-cv-02308California930 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL EDWARD GILBERT, No. 2:24-cv-02308-DC-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

CLEAR RECON CORP, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 35, 39) 16 Plaintiff Paul Edward Gilbert is proceeding pro se in this civil action. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 16, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order in the form of an “immediate stay of eviction.” (Doc. No. 35.) On December 18, 2024, the undersigned referred Plaintiff’s motion to the assigned magistrate judge for the issuance of findings and recommendations. (Doc. No. 37.) On December 19, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order be denied because “this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.