Jan Biro v. G. R. Keyes

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 13, 202523-55132California1,152 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 13 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAN CHARLES BIRO, M.D., M.D. PhD., No. 23-55132

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-06835-JGB-MAA v.

G. R. KEYES, M.D.; C. PHILLIPS, personal MEMORANDUM * capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 10, 2025**

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Jan C. Biro (“Biro”) appeals pro se from the district

court’s dismissal of his Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) with prejudice and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). without leave to amend. Biro also contests the district court’s order affirming the

magistrate judge’s discovery order denying Biro’s request for expedited discovery,

and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.