Charman

Charman v. U.S.A. Home Inspectors

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20253:23-cv-00352California1,479 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THANE CHARMAN, Case No.: 3:23-cv-352-WQH-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. U.S.A. HOME INSPECTORS, a California limited liability 15 company, 16 Defendant. 17 HAYES, Judge: The matters before the Court are: (1) the Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 32) issued by the Court and staying the proceedings; (2) the Motion to Strike Amended Reply to Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 29) filed by Plaintiff Thane Charman (“Plaintiff”); (3) the Motion Allowing Plaintiff to File Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 31) filed by Plaintiff; and (4) Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant (ECF No. 21) filed by Plaintiff. I. BACKGROUND On February 23, 2023, Plaintiff filed the Complaint (ECF No. 1) asserting claims against Defendants U.S.A. Home Inspectors and Keith Klinger (“Klinger”). On May 21, 28 2023, Plaintiff filed the operative “[First] Amended Complaint” (the “FAC”). (ECF No. 9.) On June 10, 2024, Plaintiff filed a “Motion …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.