Armour
Armour v. Housing Authority
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OLIVIA ARMOUR, Case No.: 23-cv-808-WQH-KSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v. HOUSING AUTHORITY;
PSE&G COMPANY; US
COPYRIGHTS OFFICE; US
PATENT OFFICE; FEDERAL
BUREAU OF INV. (FBI);
THOMAS VENA; SUSAN F.
MAVEN; JOSE LINARES; DOUGLAS FASCIALE; and
VERIZON PHONE COMPANY,
21 Defendants. 22 HAYES, Judge: 23 The matters before the Court are the Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (ECF 24 No. 41), Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint, Correction (ECF No. 42), Motion for 25 Entry Into Default (ECF No. 43), and the Motion for Courts to Request the HCVP 26 Voluntary Withdrawal Declaration Form From Housing Authority (ECF No. 44) filed by 27 Plaintiff Olivia Armour (“Plaintiff”). 28 I. BACKGROUND 2 On December 5, 2022, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a 3 Complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego (Case No. 37-2022- 4 00048798-CU-PT-CTL) against the U.S. Copyright Office, the U.S. Patent and Trademark 5 Office, and…