Puckett

Puckett v. Dyer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20251:22-cv-00750California1,093 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH PUCKETT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00750-KES-HBK

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. Doc. 55 JERRY DYER, et al.,

Defendants.

Pending before the Court is plaintiff Joseph Puckett’s pleading titled “Motion for

Reconsideration and Defendants Never Ask Plaintiff to Amen[d] Complaint.” Doc. 55. Liberally

construed, Puckett seeks reconsideration of the Court’s November 25, 2024, order dismissing his

case. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Joseph Puckett initiated this action on June 21, 2022. Doc. 1. On November 13,

2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations (“F&R”) to dismiss

this case for plaintiff’s repeated failure to serve defendants under Rule 4(m). Doc. 26. The F&R

advised plaintiff that any objections thereto were to be filed within 14 days of service. Id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.