Scott

Scott v. Adventist Health Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20251:22-cv-01334California892 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLOYD SCOTT, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01334-KES-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (Doc. 18) ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELD, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Floyd Scott seeks reconsideration of the October 22, 2024 order dismissing this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. I. BACKGROUND On April 19, 2024, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to dismiss this action for plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Doc. 12. The findings and recommendations were adopted on October 22, 2024, and judgment was entered that same date. Docs. 16, 17. On October 30, 2024, plaintiff filed his motion for reconsideration. Doc. 18. II. DISCUSSION Although plaintiff does not indicate the rule of procedure under which he seeks relief, the from judgment or order and as a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.