Flores

Flores v. Doe Agent 1

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20253:24-cv-01189California600 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY FLORES, Case No.: 3:24-cv-01189-JES-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DISSOLVING ORDER TO SHOW DOE AGENT 1, et al., CAUSE; and Defendants. (2) GRANTING MOTION TO

AMEND/CORRECT THE

COMPLAINT

18 [ECF No. 13] 19 On November 6, 2024, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) why the case should not be dismissed for failure to serve Defendant, Doe Agent 1. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff was ordered to file a written response on or before November 22, 2024. Id. On November 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed a response to the Court’s OSC detailing reasons for the delay and informing the Court that initially Plaintiff could not identify Doe Agent 1 and filed an amended complaint (“FAC”) naming the United States as a defendant and has completed service on the United States. ECF No. at 11. Further, Plaintiff argues that the filing of the amended complaint restarts the time period for service under Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.