Faison

Faison v. Alameda County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20253:24-cv-06059California608 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DEONTAE CHARLES FAISON, et al., Case No. 24-cv-06059-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

ALAMEDA COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 27 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against individual officers, Alameda County, and The East Bay Regional Park District (the “District”), alleging District Officer Knea tased Plaintiff Deontae Charles Faison while he was in the estuary at Martin Luther King Jr. Regional Shoreline Park, causing life-threatening injuries. (Dkt. No. 20.) Plaintiffs originally filed their complaint bringing Monell claims against both the County and the District (Dkt. No. 1), but later amended their complaint to allege Monell liability only against the District. (Dkt. No. 20.) The District and Officer Knea now move to dismiss the Monell claims against the District. (Dkt. No. 27.) After carefully considering the parties’ written submissions, the Court concludes oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.