Taylor

Taylor v. Starbucks Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20253:24-cv-01511California2,530 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SHEENA TAYLOR, Case No.: 3:24-cv-01511-RBM-MMP

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S STARBUCKS CORPORATION, APPLICATION TO PROCEED Defendant. IN DISTRICT COURT

WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES

OR COSTS [Doc. 2] 14 (2) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO EFFECT SERVICE 16 (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY [Doc. 3]

(4) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

[Doc. 4] 22 [Doc. 2–4] 23 24 25 Plaintiff Sheena Taylor has filed: (1) an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“IFP Motion”) (Doc. 2); (2) a Motion to File Electronically (Doc. 3); and (3) a Request for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.