Eftekari

Eftekari v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20253:24-cv-02274California2,055 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BIJAN EFTEKARI, Case No.: 24-CV-2274 JLS (KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING WITHOUT SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING,

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S EX

INC., et al., PARTE EMERGENCY MOTION Defendants. FOR TRO, AND

(2) ORDERING PLAINTIFF BIJAN

EFTEKARI TO SHOW CAUSE AS

TO SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

20 (ECF No. 3) 21 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Bijan Eftekari’s Ex Parte Emergency Motion for TRO to Enjoin January 13, 2025 Trustee Sale (“TRO Mot.,” ECF No. 3). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s filing and the applicable law, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s TRO Motion. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) governs the issuance of a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). The standard for a TRO is identical to the standard for a preliminary injunction. Frontline Med. Assocs., Inc. v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.