Eftekari
Eftekari v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20253:24-cv-02274California2,055 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BIJAN EFTEKARI, Case No.: 24-CV-2274 JLS (KSC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) DENYING WITHOUT SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING,
PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S EX
INC., et al., PARTE EMERGENCY MOTION Defendants. FOR TRO, AND
(2) ORDERING PLAINTIFF BIJAN
EFTEKARI TO SHOW CAUSE AS
TO SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION
20 (ECF No. 3) 21 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Bijan Eftekari’s Ex Parte Emergency Motion for TRO to Enjoin January 13, 2025 Trustee Sale (“TRO Mot.,” ECF No. 3). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s filing and the applicable law, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s TRO Motion. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) governs the issuance of a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). The standard for a TRO is identical to the standard for a preliminary injunction. Frontline Med. Assocs., Inc. v.…