Rubio

Rubio v. Colvin

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20254:22-cv-05372California1,081 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD R., Case No. 22-cv-05372-KAW

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEY'S FEES

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff brought this action seeking review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”). Following the Court’s remand of the case for further proceedings, the Commissioner granted Plaintiff’s application for benefits, entitling Plaintiff to $113,643.00 in retroactive benefits. (Mot. for Attorney’s Fees at 1, Dkt. No. 25; see also Exh. 3.) Plaintiff’s counsel, Katherine Siegfried, now brings a motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1383(d)(2)(B), seeking an award of $28,410.75. (Mot. for Attorney’s Fees at 1.) The Court deems the matter suitable for disposition without hearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Having considered the papers filed by the parties and the relevant legal authority, the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.