Oglesby

(PC) Kelly v. Oglesby

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20251:25-cv-00042California1,171 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES CARL KELLY, No. 1:25-cv-00042-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION WILLIAM OGLESBY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF PAY THE

Defendants. FILING FEE FOR THIS ACTION 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 On January 3, 2025, Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action in the United 19 States District Court for the Northern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) The action was 20 transferred to this Court on January 8, 2025. Plaintiff has not submitted an application to proceed 21 in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 or paid the $405.00 filing fee for this action. 22 However, a review of the Court’s electronic filing system reflects that Plaintiff has suffered three 23 of more strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and is not allowed to proceed in forma pauperis unless…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.