(HC) Koroma v. Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20251:25-cv-00046California516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IBRAHIM LABOR KOROMA., No. 1:25-cv-00046-SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED

v. [FORTY-FIVE DAY DEADLINE] MERRICK GARLAND, et al.,, Respondents. 16 Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his indefinite detention by the United States Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”). Petitioner is a native and citizen of Sierra Leone. Petitioner states he has been continuously detained by ICE since approximately May 11, 2023, and received a final order of removal on May 21, 2024. He states he has been in ICE custody for more than six months since his removal order became final. Petitioner contends that his detention pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(2) has exceeded the six-month presumptive period set forth in Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), that his continued detention is no longer reasonable, that Respondent has been unable to effect his removal to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.