Shah
(PC) Armenta v. Shah
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD ARMENTA, Case No. 2:22-cv-0415-TLN-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SANJAY SHAH, Defendant. 16 Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to compel. ECF No. 65. I will grant defendant’s motion and order plaintiff to provide discovery responses by February 10, 2025. Background Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The third amended complaint alleges that defendant Dr. Sanjay Shah violated plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment rights by not informing plaintiff in a timely manner that his appendix had not been removed, despite representations from defendant that it had been removed during a prior operation. ECF No. 31. Defendant timely answered, and on June 12, 2024, the court issued the discovery and scheduling order. The scheduling order set the deadline for serving all discovery requests as 27 28 1 …