Jones

(PC) Autry v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20252:22-cv-00554California768 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JONATHAN COLLIN AUTRY, Case No. 2:22-cv-0554-TLN-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff has three pending motions. The first is a document in which he requests discovery from defendants. ECF No. 61. The second is a motion for additional law library access, ECF No. 64, and the third seeks the appointment of counsel, ECF No. 65. For the forgoing reasons, each motion is denied. Discovery Requests Discovery requests shall be filed with the court only if they are at issue. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 250.2-250.4. Currently, there is no court proceeding that requires review of plaintiff’s discovery requests. To the extent that plaintiff intended to serve defendants with his discovery request by filing them with the court, that approach is improper. Plaintiff must serve his discovery requests on defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30-36. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.