CDCR

(PS) Singh v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20252:24-cv-03148California1,235 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAGHVENDRA SINGH, Case No. 2:24-cv-3148-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner, brings this action alleging a host of broad inadequacies throughout the California prison system administered by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). I recommend, for the reasons stated below, that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. I will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.