Lance Wood v. Paul Panther

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 202523-35407California565 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LANCE CONWAY WOOD; RENEE No. 23-35407

WOOD,

D.C. No. 1:15-cv-00092-DCN Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM *

PAUL R. PANTHER, Deputy Attorney General; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 14, 2025**

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Lance Wood (“Wood”), an incarcerated individual, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Renee Anderson (“Anderson”),1 Wood’s former spouse, brought this action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants-Appellees, for alleged violations of their

constitutional rights. Wood and Anderson now appeal from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.