Daniel Rhine v. Pete Buttigieg
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 202523-35252California722 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 14 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL RHINE, No. 23-35252
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01761-RAJ
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PETE BUTTIGIEG, United States Secretary of Transportation,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 14, 2025**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges
Daniel Rhine appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his
action against the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) under Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964. Rhine alleges claims for disparate treatment, retaliation,
and hostile work environment arising from the FAA’s decision to terminate his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…