Verganza

United States v. Verganza

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 202524-904California1,156 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-904 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 6:21-cr-00308-MC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PEDRO VERGANZA, AKA Pedro Keny Verganza,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 4, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

A jury convicted Appellant Pedro Verganza (“Verganza”) of one count of

possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and one count of possession

with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (b)(1)(C). Prior to trial, Verganza filed a motion to suppress, which the district

court denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.