Muhammad Adom v. City of Los Angeles
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 202523-55558California987 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 14 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MUHAMMAD ADOM, No. 23-55558
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:21-cv-00711-JFW-KES v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES; BRYAN MEMORANDUM*
TAHUITE, LAPD Officer,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 14, 2025**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges
Muhammad Adom appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law arising from a traffic
stop, the search of his car, and his arrest for a suspected violation of California
Penal Code § 25400(a)(1), which prohibits carrying a concealed firearm in a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App.…