Sean Ryan v. FIGS, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20252:22-cv-07939California11,604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 SEAN RYAN, Case № 2:22-cv-07939-ODW (AGRx)

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST

14 FIGS, INC. et al., AMENDED CLASS ACTION

Defendants. COMPLAINT [118] [120] [123]

16 I. INTRODUCTION On November 1, 2022, Plaintiff Sean Ryan filed the initial Complaint in this 19 putative securities class action. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Thereafter, the case was 20 consolidated with City of Hallandale Beach Police Officers and Firefighters 21 Personnel Retirement Trust v. FIGS, Inc. et al., No. 2:22-cv-08912-ODW (KSx). 22 (Min. Order, ECF No. 64.) The Court designated this case as the lead case and 23 appointed Ronald Hoch, City of Pensacola Police Officers’ Retirement Plan (“City of 24 Pensacola”), City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System (“City of Warren”), 25 Kissimmee Utility Authority Employees’ …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.