Yao Guo v. Kevin Robl

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20252:22-cv-05576California1,556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA S

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. 2:22-cv-05576-FWS-MAA Date: January 10, 2025 Title: Yao Guo, et al. v. Kevin Robl, et al.

Present: HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY WITH COURT

ORDER [65]

In this case, Plaintiffs Yao Guo and Gosdam, Inc. (together, “Plaintiffs”) assert claims related to an alleged Ponzi scheme against Defendants Kevin Robl (“Robl’’), Remington Chase (“Chase”), Christopher Bremble (“Bremble’’), Base Media Technology Group Limited (“Base Production Capital LLC (“Production Capital’’), Production House International, LLC (“Production House”), John Burgee (“Burgee’”’), Robert Abramoff (“Abramoff”), Burgee & Abramoff P.C. (“B&A”’), and unnamed Does. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.