Yao Guo v. Kevin Robl
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20252:22-cv-05576California1,556 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA S
CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL
Case No. 2:22-cv-05576-FWS-MAA Date: January 10, 2025 Title: Yao Guo, et al. v. Kevin Robl, et al.
Present: HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present Not Present
PROCEEDINGS: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY WITH COURT
ORDER [65]
In this case, Plaintiffs Yao Guo and Gosdam, Inc. (together, “Plaintiffs”) assert claims related to an alleged Ponzi scheme against Defendants Kevin Robl (“Robl’’), Remington Chase (“Chase”), Christopher Bremble (“Bremble’’), Base Media Technology Group Limited (“Base Production Capital LLC (“Production Capital’’), Production House International, LLC (“Production House”), John Burgee (“Burgee’”’), Robert Abramoff (“Abramoff”), Burgee & Abramoff P.C. (“B&A”’), and unnamed Does. …