Wilson

Wilson v. Unknown Oceanside Police Officers

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20253:23-cv-00270California11,941 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TEDDY LEROY WILSON, Case No.: 23-cv-270-TWR-DDL

Plaintiff, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. FOR ORDER GRANTING UNKNOWN OCEANSIDE POLICE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR OFFICERS, et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants. [Dkt. No. 60] 17 Plaintiff Teddy LeRoy Wilson, proceeding pro se in this civil rights action, alleges various law enforcement personnel violated his constitutional rights during his arrest on January 3, 2023. Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment or Alternatively, Summary Adjudication of Issues (the “Motion” or “Mot.”) by defendants City of Oceanside, Sergeant Jeff Brandt, Officers Daniel Post, Aaron Weirich, Billy Walker, Natalie Laser, and Dustin Lundy, and Field Evidence Technician Michelle Alarcon (collectively, “Defendants”). Dkt. No. 60. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Civil Local Rule 72.3.e, the undersigned Magistrate Judge submits …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.