Swanson

Swanson v. Flores

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20253:23-cv-02021California5,651 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

esl ee slain FILED.

GLERK, U6. DISTRICT COURT

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA || JAMIE SWANSON, Case No.: 3:23-cv-02021-BEN-DEB Plaintiff, ORDER 11 || 12 || DIONISIO FLORES, [ECF No. 15} Defendant. 14 || ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 16 Plaintiff, Jamie Swanson, initiates this action against Defendant Dionisio Flores, 18 || asserting a single claim under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. § ||2000bb, et seg. (“RFRA”). Defendant moves to dismiss the claim pursuant to Fed. R. 90 || Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6) asserting Plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief may be 21 || granted or, alternatively, that he is entitled to qualified immunity. The motion to dismiss |\is denied. || I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff claims she was a civilian…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.