Nakashyan

(PC) Tate v. Nakashyan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20251:22-cv-00624California1,338 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEREK TATE, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00624-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ISSUING STAY OF THESE

PROCEEDINGS PENDING RESOLUTION

v. OF PENDING MOTIONS

DIANA NAKASHYAN, et al., Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Since late April 2024, nine substantive motions have been filed in this matter. (See Docs. 42, 43, 48, 50, 52, 56, 59, 65, 66.) Thus far, the Court has resolved four of those motions. (See Docs. 60 [resolving Doc. 43], 61 [resolving Docs. 42, 56, 59].) As of this date, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment addressing the merits of Plaintiff’s claims (Doc. 50), Plaintiff’s motions relating to summary judgment (Docs. 52, 65, 66), and Plaintiff’s motion to compel (Doc. 23 48) remain pending resolution.1 On December 19, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Plaintiffs Objections To The Magistrates Judges Ruling For Sanctions Under Rule 37(e).” (Doc. 63.) Plaintiff’s filing seeks reconsideration of the Court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.