Quintanar

Quintanar v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20253:24-cv-01286California4,276 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 RACHEL QUINTANAR & REYNALDO Case No.: 3:24-cv-01286-CAB-DEB

QUINTANAR,

ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS v. 15 [ECF No. 6] COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs Rachel and Reynaldo Quintanar bring this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 20 § 1983 and other state and common law causes against the County of San Diego and 21 unnamed San Diego County Sheriff’s Department Defendants (Deputy Defendants 1–5 and 22 Doe Defendants 1–20). [See generally First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 4.] The 23 County filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ false arrest and negligence claims, Bane Act 24 claim, and the Section 1983 claims against Deputy Defendants 3–5. [ECF No. 6-1 at 5.] 25 The Court grants the motion as it relates to Deputy Defendants 3–5 and partially grants the 26 motion as to the negligence claim. 27 I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS The Court takes the alleged material facts as true and construes them in the light most favorable to Plaintiff. Stoner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.