Pilcher

Pilcher v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20251:24-cv-00854California7,404 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOUGLAS PILCHER, Case No. 1:24-cv-00854-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO

STAY PROCEEDINGS AND COMPEL

v. ARBITRATION

CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, (Doc. 5)

INC.,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Douglas Pilcher (“Plaintiff”) initiated this putative class action with the filing of a complaint on May 29, 2024, against Defendant CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. (“Defendant” or “CarMax”) in the Superior Court of California, County of Kern, with the assigned case number BCV-24-101786. (Doc. 1). On July 24, 2024, Defendant removed the action to this Court. (Id.).1 Plaintiff asserts that CarMax violated the California False Advertising Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17500, et seq. (“FAL”) and the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq. (“UCL”) by allegedly failing to perform advertised 125+ point inspections of three vehicles Plaintiff purchased from CarMax. (Id. at ¶ 10). Plaintiff seeks on behalf…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.