Borla

(HC) Sharp v. Borla

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20251:24-cv-01408California665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ANTHONY A. SHARP, Case No. 1:24-cv-01408-JLT-EPG-HC Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF

v. HABEAS CORPUS EDWARD BORLA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner Anthony A. Sharp is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. As the instant petition fails to state a cognizable federal habeas claim, the undersigned recommends dismissal of the petition. I. BACKGROUND In 2016, Petitioner was sentenced by the Fresno County Superior Court to an imprisonment term of twenty-five years. (ECF No. 1 at 1.1) On November 14, 2024, Petitioner filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus, challenging the state courts’ denial of resentencing. (Id. at 5.) Petitioner asserts that his sentence is unauthorized due to the passage of California Senate Bill 567 and Assembly Bill 518. (Id. at 12.) /// …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.