(PS) Roberts v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SYDNEY BROOKE ROBERTS and No. 2:22-cv-1699 DJC AC

DAVID TYRONE SAMUEL,

12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v.

SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The case proceeds on the basis of the Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 11) as narrowed by the findings and recommendations and order granting partial dismissal (ECF Nos. 36, 47). Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. ECF No. 67. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends the motion be DENIED. I. Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiffs filed this action in pro se and in forma pauperis on September 27, 2022. ECF No. 1. Pursuant to the screening process associated with IFP status, plaintiffs’ complaint was amended twice…