(PS) Orji v. Walmart Superstores, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20252:23-cv-01795California5,965 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOY ORJI, No. 2:23-cv-1795-TLN-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

WALMART SUPERSTORES, INC., Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff Joy Orji is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. section 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned are Defendant WalMart Superstores, Inc.’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 9) and motion to strike portions of the Complaint (ECF No. 8), as well as Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a sur-reply to each motion (ECF No. 26). For the reasons stated below, the Court grants leave to file the sur-replies, recommends the motion to dismiss be granted without leave to amend, and recommends the motion to strike be denied. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff commenced this action on August 23, 2023, by filing a Complaint and paying the applicable filing fee. ECF No. 1. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.