Parrilla

Parrilla v. Devalk CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 2025E082525California3,178 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/15/25 Parrilla v. Devalk CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THOMAS RUSSELL PARRILLA,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E082525

v. (Super.Ct.No. CVSW2306029)

MARK E. DEVALK, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Albert J. Wojcik, Judge.

Affirmed.

Law Offices of David Mayberry and David P. Mayberry for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

1 Defendant and appellant Mark E. Devalk appeals the grant of a civil harassment

restraining order issued against him pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.

requiring he keep away from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.