Kariuki

Kariuki v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 15, 202523-4093California1,293 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 15 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EUNICE WAMAITHA KARIUKI, No. 23-4093 Agency No. Petitioner, A088-544-364 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 24, 2024 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Eunice Wamaitha Kariuki, a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions

for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision denying her motion

to reopen removal proceedings. Kariuki acknowledges that the motion was

untimely by several years but argues that the BIA erred by determining that she

had not shown “extraordinary circumstances” to justify a waiver of the one-year

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. filing deadline under 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(iv). As set forth in Magana-

Magana v. Garland, No. 23-1887, 2024 WL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.