People v. Palmer CA1/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 2025A170500California1,077 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/15/25 P. v. Palmer CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A170500

v. LAZEBIETY DEAN PALMER, JR., (Solano County Super. Ct. No. VCR236252) Defendant and Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

After defendant Lazebiety Dean Palmer, Jr., was held to answer for three counts of attempted murder (§§ 664, 187) and several other felony charges, he filed a motion to set aside the information under section 995. According to that motion, the People deprived Palmer of a substantial right by failing to disclose purportedly exculpatory and material evidence under Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83 (Brady) before the preliminary hearing. The trial court granted Palmer’s motion and the People filed this appeal, arguing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.