United States v. Superior Care Pharmacy

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20253:18-cv-01002California3,183 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 18-cv-1002-MMA-MSB ex rel. SARAH DUNTSCH,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

Plaintiff, DAVID WALROD’S MOTION TO v. DISMISS

SUPERIOR CARE PHARMACY, et al., [Doc. No. 81] Defendants. 16 17 18 On September 16, 2024, the United States of America filed a first amended intervenor complaint against Superior Care Pharmacy, Inc., Derek Ishaque, David Walrod, and Justus Benjamin alleging, among other things, violations of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., and the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. Doc. No. 76 (“FAC”). On September 30, 2024, Defendant David Walrod filed a motion to dismiss. Doc. No. 81. The government filed a response in opposition to Walrod’s motion, to which Walrod replied. Doc. Nos. 83, 85. The Court found this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.