Translarity, Inc. v. Grand Junction Semiconductor Pte. Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20253:24-cv-02423California838 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TRANSLARITY, INC., Case No. 24-cv-02423-SI

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING “MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION,” CONSTRUED

AS MOTION SEEKING

GRAND JUNCTION SEMICONDUCTOR CERTIFICATION FOR PTE. LTD., et al., INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 78 12 On December 23, 2024, plaintiff Translarity Inc. filed a “motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration” pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9(b). Although framed as such a motion, Translarity states that it does not ask the Court to reconsider its rulings in the Court’s October 29, 2024 Order Granting in Part Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Staying Remaining Proceedings. Instead, Translarity requests that the Court issue an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) certifying the October 29, 2024 order for interlocutory appeal. “Section 1292(b) provides a mechanism by which litigants can bring an immediate appeal of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.